Effective Regional Approaches to Contain Covid-19: Governmental Authority in Action

Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in social science, education and humanities research, 2024

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.2991/978-2-38476-242-2_41
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study evaluates the allocation of authority to regions for the implementation and management of Covid-19 and examines their adherence to the Principles of Regional Autonomy.Employing a normative juridical approach with a statutory focus, the research scrutinizes the policy framework established by the Central Government, characterizing it as reactive due to limited input from stakeholders, the public, and experts during policy formulation.Analysis reveals that regional authorities primarily rely on regional regulations, particularly Regional Head Regulations, for Covid-19 management.However, these regulations often stem from responses to directives issued by the central government.The study identifies discrepancies between the devolution of authority to regions and the principles of Regional Autonomy, notably concerning transparency and adequate funding for decentralized governance.Many regional policies are funded through local budgets (APBD), indicating a reliance on central government allocations rather than genuine fiscal autonomy.