Exploring the labyrinth of light: multiple Bragg Diffraction phenomena in face-centered cubic photonic crystals

2023

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.54355/tbusphys/1.4.2023.0005
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Corrigendum Notice: A corrigendum has been issued for this article and is included at the end of this document. Referred to by: “N. Dosaev and G. Tulekova, “Exploring the labyrinth of light: multiple Bragg Diffraction phenomena in face-centered cubic photonic crystals”, tbusphys, vol. 1, no. 4, p. 0005, Sept. 2023. doi: 10.54355/tbusphys/1.4.2023.0005c” This work presents the outcomes of an experimental study aimed at exploring electron diffraction phenomena within a controlled environment. The experiment involved measuring the radii of diffraction rings produced under varying acceleration voltages, with a focus on the first-order ring. Unexpectedly, the observed values were half of the anticipated results, raising questions about the accuracy of the measurements. The analysis revealed that the measured value of d1 closely resembled the theoretical value of d2, suggesting a potential oversight of the first diffraction ring, possibly due to its diminutive size. The high brightness of the incident light further complicated the measurement process. Accounting for the possibility of overlooking the first diffraction ring, the derived values for d2 (128.24±33.26 pm) and d3 (70.00±5.21 pm) were compared to theoretical values (123 pm and 80 pm, respectively). Despite the challenges, the experimental results fell within an acceptable range, considering the inherent uncertainties. To mitigate errors in radii measurement, the article suggests the implementation of an automated system and recommends a thorough reassessment of experimental setup configurations to optimize conditions for more accurate measurements. The findings highlight the importance of methodological refinement to enhance precision and reliability in electron diffraction studies. This work contributes valuable insights to the field and underscores the continuous need for advancements in experimental techniques.