COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPT OF“QUALITY ASSURANCE” IN THE SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE

2024

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.59787/2413-5488-2024-45-1-7-22
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article gives an overview of the updated analysis of the concept and nature of “quality”. The present research on systematic review of literature of scientific articles and theoretical documents is aimed at identifying concepts, theories, and research trends and methods linked to the quality management in educational setting. The review findings demonstrates that theoretical papers, such as reports, policies, and concepts of the concept “quality” identifies three common approaches to the concept “quality”: quality as a process, as a procedure and as a result. Analysis of the empirical papers revealed that the most prominent concepts were the quality assurance, control, and quality culture in education setting. Following the inductive analysis, this study investigated common research trends and conceptual framework how the “quality” concept is defined in educational setting. Different data analysis techniques have been applied in this article. Meanwhile, the definition of the concept “quality” includes content analysis, descriptive analysis, and inferential analysis.