Methodology for creating a geodetic basis In topocentric projection

2024

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.26577/jgem.2024.v72.i1.04
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The introduction of satellite technologies for determining coordinates opens up new opportunities both for creating a geodetic basis for the development of the subsoil, and for the production of surveying and geodetic works at mines. In this regard, it seems very promising to transfer the coordinates obtained by an automated method on the surface of an ellipsoid to a horizontal local projection oriented normally to a vertical line. At the same time, it is possible to control this deviation and select a local area that meets the specified accuracy parameters. Such an approach to the creation of a geodynamic polygon (GDP) during the development of the subsoil will certainly make it possible to more accurately make design decisions in kind. The article proposes an up-to-date approach to the formation of a geodynamic polygon, which consists in the use of a local flat surface with topocentric coordinates. The GDP created in topocentric coordinates has minimal distortions relative to geocentric coordinates, in which the lion's share of geodetic work is carried out today. Calculations and concrete examples of the translation of coordinates from a geocentric system to a topocentric one (a flat projection of geocentric coordinates with topocentric coordinates) are given, in which the measurement results are equalized. It is important to note that the results are compared with respect to the Gauss-Kruger zonal coordinate system. The possibility of translating coordinates from one system to another is demonstrated in order to preserve traditional forms of material presentation and measurement evaluation.