USE OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT METHODOLOGIES IN CONTEMPORARY HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

2024

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.55871/2072-9847-2024-62-1-21-31
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This systematic review explores the application and effectiveness of project management methodologies within the context of modern higher education institutions (HEIs). The study investigates a spectrum of methodologies, ranging from traditional to customized models, with a focus on identifying success factors and challenges. Employing a rigorous search and selection process, the research synthesizes key findings from existing literature, ensuring methodological robustness. The results of this study offer insights into the prevalent project management practices adopted by HEIs and their consequential impact on universities. By exploring methodologies such as Agile, Hybrid approach, Lean, Lean Six Sigma, Scrum, and Scrumban, the study sheds light on the adaptability and suitability of these approaches in the unique landscape of HEIs. This systematic review contributes to the academic discourse by providing a nuanced understanding of the integration of project management methodologies in higher education settings. The findings serve as a benchmark for current practices and offer practical guidance for educators and administrators seeking to enhance project management processes within their institutions.