Comparison of rArt v 1-based sublingual and subcutaneous immunotherapy in a murine model of asthma

npj Vaccines, 2025

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1038/s41541-025-01112-1
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Mugwort-allergic patients frequently experience severe respiratory allergies due to sensitization to the major allergen Art v 1, with allergen-specific immunotherapy (ASIT) as the only causal treatment to halt disease progression. This study evaluated the effects of subcutaneous (SCIT) and sublingual (SLIT) ASIT with purified recombinant Art v 1 (rArt v 1) in a murine model of mugwort pollen of asthma. BALB/c mice were sensitized with Artemisia vulgaris pollen extract and treated with either rArt v 1-based SCIT adjuvanted with Montanide ISA-51, rArt v 1-based SLIT, an extract-based commercial SLIT vaccine, or PBS. Both rArt v 1-based SCIT and SLIT improved lung pathology and reduced airway reactivity following allergen challenge, with rArt v 1-based SCIT inducing Th1-polarized immune responses marked by increased IFN-γ production and rArt v 1-specific IgG 1 /IgG 2a , while SLIT induced stronger mucosal IgA responses. These findings highlight the therapeutic potential of rArt v 1-based ASIT for mugwort allergy.