2021-2022 жылдардағы АҚШ-тың бұқаралық ақпарат құралдарындағы Қазақстанның бейнесі («The Washington Post», «The New York Times», CNN материалдары негізінде)

2023

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.32523/2616-7174-2023-143-2-137-147
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article focuses on various interpretations of the concept of «image of the state» and the practice of using its synonymous terms. The concept of image in the media space is described in detail and the role of the media in building the image reputation of the state in foreign media is revealed. Based on a wide empirical material, the image of the Republic of Kazakhstan in the publications of three well-known US media corporations for 2021-2022 is shown. All image markers and components are given in a detailed qualitative and quantitative dimension, which allows you to detect sustainable trends and problematic issues, and identify possible ways to resolve them. The article concludes that the image of Kazakhstan, formed in these media, is generally not attractive. The interest of the American audience in Kazakhstan is not great, but it noticeably increases during periods of serious political and social events, which could be seen during the introduction of the state of emergency in the Republic of Kazakhstan in January 2022. The negative evaluative context prevails in the coverage of the activities of government institutions, domestic politics, democratic elections, while the positive one prevails in materials about sports, culture, and tourism.