Specialist in court proceedings of the Republic of Kazakhstan: problems and prospects

2024

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.46914/2959-4197-2023-1-4-42-47
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the current state of the application of special knowledge in the form of participation of a specialist in the proof process, the peculiarities of legal regulation of the organizational and methodological foundations of his activities. The authors point to the process of “convergence” of two forms of application of special knowledge (expert and specialist) on legal status and functions, which creates problematic situations in the practice of their application. The article presents a look at the difference between the two forms of application of special knowledge, optimization of forensic expertise, as well as, in accordance with the requests of legal practice, improvement of the legal and organizational foundations of the activities of a specialist and an expert.