The presence of the “internationality” of international criminal justice

2023

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.31489/2023l4/18-26
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Justice is a perpetual topic for mankind. International criminal justice is generally regarded as criminal justice or global justice in academia, but neither of them can provide comprehensive content for international criminal justice alone. In order to make international criminal justice be correctly understood, both theories must be integrated. But there is tension between the two propositions. In order to bridge the gap between the two theories, it is necessary to build a bridge for the integration of the two theories ― international criminal justice must incorporate the “international” element. “Internationality” is an indispensable element of international criminal justice. Through the historical investigation of the concepts of “global justice” and “criminal justice”, this paper believes that the International Criminal Court must fully consider the “international” characteristics of “individual” embedded in “state” when allocating “negative evaluation” between different cases. The authority of the International Criminal Court can be maintained only when the “internationality” of international criminal justice is fully considered by the International Criminal Court.