COUNTRY RISK ASSESSMENT OF THE BANKING SECTOR: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

2023

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.52821/2789-4401-2023-3-123-136
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to conduct a comparative assessment of the country risk of the banking sector of the countries of the world using the methods BICRA from S&P and Bloomberg. Methodology. As the main research methods were used: generalization, BICRA from S&P and Bloomberg methods, comparative analysis. Originality/value of the research. The article provides a comparative analysis of the results of the assessment of country risks of the banking sector of the countries of the world according to the BICRA from S&P and Bloomberg methods based on current data for the last 3 years. Findings. The results of the analysis showed that despite the diff erence between the BICRA from S&P and Bloomberg methods, the results are generally almost identical. There are exceptions in some countries. According to the authors, this is due to the presence of accounting for currency risks in the Bloomberg methodology.