The Disconnect Between Governmental Tourism Strategies and Local Business Priorities

2023

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.32523/2789-4320-2023-3-356-367
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Tourism has been a crucial driver of economic growth in Kazakhstan, contributing positively to the country‘s GDP. To support this sector, the government has invested heavily in developing the tourism industry, making it a key pillar in their five-year plan. This study aimed to evaluate the impacts of the government’s tourism plan on Bayanaul, which is among TOP 10 priority tourists’ areas on the country’s Tourism Map. To reach the aim of the article authors examined the government’s tourism plan for Bayanaul, including its objectives and strategies, and then assessed how these align with the priorities and needs of local businesses in the area. It also explored potential consequences of any disconnect between government policies and local interests for the success and sustainability of tourism development in Bayanaul. Data was collected through interviews and surveys from various stakeholders, including government officers involved in tourism planning and implementation, business owners in Bayanaul area, and tourists who had visited the area. The results showed that different stakeholders had varying opinions on the implementation and impact of tourism development in the Bayanaul area, which indicated a lack of communication among different stakeholders during the implementation of the government plan.