Competency in scientific writing training for beginner researchers: NVIVO analysis

2023

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.51488/1680-080x/2023.2-28
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Writing scientific papers is a condition for advancement and a requirement for professional development for civil servants. This study aims to map the competency needs in order to improve the current training programs and create new supportive training at the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources with the help of a descriptive qualitative research methodology, including interviewing participants through open questions in Google Forms, using flipchart media in a focus group, and analyzing training curriculum document. The organizational performance diagnostic model was mentioned concerning aspects of individual data collection. To analyze the data the Nvivo 12 application and initial, focus, and theme coding procedures were used. The study's findings demonstrate that technical competence and assistance for writing scientific papers were following the training program for scientific writing. The plan for demonstrating its competency could serve as a starting point for improving instructional materials, creating new training programs, and creating a supportive community for writers.