Denominative and Deverbal Suffixes in Kökşetav Copy of Divân Hikmet

2022

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.26577/jos.2022.v103.i4.03
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Denominative and deverbal suffixes in the historical texts of Turkish are rich both in terms of number and their functions. We encounter different functions of denominative and deverbal suffixes which is main subject of our article in the Kökşetav (Kazakhstan) copy of Divân-ı Hikmet. We confirmed nearly twenty suffixes like {+Aç}, {+An}, {+çI}, {+dAş}, {+ĠA}, {+ĠU}, {+lIḳ}, {+lUĠ}, {+nçI}, {+mAn}, {+sIz}, {+rAḲ}, {-AḲ/ -Ḳ}, {-(U)Ḳ/ -(I)Ḳ}, {-(U)Ġ/ -(I)Ġ}, {-ĠAn}, {-ĠUçI}, {-ĠUlUĠ}, {-ḲUn}, {-ş}etc. in the text. In generally these suffixes have the same phonetic features with Chagatai Turkish but besides that we can see the traces of these suffixes not only in Old Turkish but also in contemporary Turkish Dialects. Therefore, we can regard these suffixes as a follow-up of suffixes which were used before Chagatai period. In the article, these issues will be examined in detail.