Between Exile and Repatriation: Vainakhs and the Khrushchev “Thaw”

2022

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.31518/2618-9100-2022-6-18
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The consequences of deportation, exile and repatriation as an example of the Soviet migration policy are analyzed in this paper based on the data referring to the Chechen and Ingush people.Total deportation and the twelve-years exile turned out to be counterproductive measures, as they led to ethnic consolidation and allowed the "punished people" to resist not only foreign cultural influence, but also Sovietization.In the context of liberalization and the rejection of mass repression, the authorities tried to return the Vainakhs to the Soviet system restoring their national autonomy and allowing repatriation to the historical homeland.The authors attempt illustrating the updated paradigm of the dialogue between the authorities and the ethnic group, and the boundaries of the communicative space.The publication brings into the field of research two documents from the thematic case on the return of the Chechen-Ingush population to the CHI ASSR (Chechen-Ingush Automous Soviet Socialist Republic) in 1957, deposited in the fonds of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Kazakhstan and stored in the Archive of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan.