Understanding Authorship Attributions of Kazakh Texts via Distance Measures

2022

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/sist54437.2022.9945707
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Author identification of a given text is an important issue to be solved or improved in Natural Language Processing field (NLP) and has many useful applications like plagiarism detection and forensic analysis. However, there is little to no information about effectiveness of authorship identification methods in application to Kazakh language. This paper is then dedicated to implementing and reviewing accuracy of several empirical language-based authorship identification techniques. For purposes of this paper, a new dataset was assembled, which consisted of texts from 11 different authors, including, but not limited to, Abai Qunanbaiuly, Muhtar Ayezov, and Saken Seifyllin. All documents in the corpus were pre-processed, tokenized, and split into samples containing 5,000 n-grams of size 1. Reviewed methods have included Chi-Squared Measure by Kilgariff and Delta Method by Burrows, as well as its derivatives and variants. Experimentally, we show that methods which are based on Burrows' Delta measure produce some promising results when applied to texts written in Kazakh language.