PRACTICE OF CONDUCTING A COORDINATED AUDIT BY THE SAI-MEMBERS OF INTOSAI

2022

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.55871/2072-9847-2022-54-1-29-36
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The importance of state audit both at the domestic and international level is growing day by day. After all, thanks to the state audit, inspections are carried out on topical issues, errors, violations are identified, and possible ways to prevent them. And the identification of violations, consulting on their elimination is one of the tasks of the SAI of each country. Therefore, this article substantiates the need for further study of best practices of foreign countries, analyzes the experience of the SAI of the INTOSAI member states, the main organization uniting state audit and financial control bodies. In particular, the organization and conduct of a coordinated audit in countries such as Australia, Russia, and Ukraine were studied. As a result of the research, it was found that three types of coordinated audit are used in these countries: parallel, joint and coordinated. Based on the analysis of domestic legal acts, the authors revealed that two types of coordinated audit are used in the Republic of Kazakhstan, namely parallel and joint. Based on the experience of foreign countries, it is proposed to introduce a connected audit into the practice of state audit and financial control bodies.