Allocation of Promising Objects for a Group of Deposits in the Karagay Saddle

2022

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.56578/atg010105
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This work completes the thorough petrophysical interpretation of 46 wells, as well as a technical feasibility analysis.Even though the acoustic logging was of very poor quality, work was done to get it ready for use in creating synthetic seismograms that accurately represented the section.The sle.28 Karagie Severny, which was drilled in 2012 and has significantly better GIS quality, was used to control this operation.Through a dynamic analysis, the shooting system's (footprint) influence on the distribution of the amplitudes at the Karagie Severny site was not eliminated during data processing, but it was removed during the re-processing.As a result, the findings for Karagie Severny should be taken with a grain of salt because the initial data's quality was not considered when choosing the sites for the suggested wells.However, the seismic facies analysis in two formsclassical and cluster-showed the presence of at least three primary facies complexes, which are reflected in both formed, with a more precise distribution in accordance with cluster analysis.