Abstract
The article discusses the need for Man to develop such a way of being in the World that would exclude the possibility of worldview and practical, anthropocentrism. It is noted that the Western way of being was initially anthropocentric. At the same time, anthropocentrism here appears in two modes as active and as passive. It is emphasized that the eastern way of being is ontologically acceptable, but it does not orient Man to be a co-worker of cosmogenesis. It is concluded that the desired way of being a person in the World can be grown from the synthesis of what is represented in the eastern and western ways of human being.