Comparison of Russian and Kazakhstan proctoring systems

2021

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.31489/2021ped4/83-91
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article analyzes the problems faced by teachers in the context of the forced transition to distance learning in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, when interaction with students was carried out only using information technologies. There are problems of organizing and conducting exams in remote access: the difficulties of identifying students, the use of proctoring technologies. The main problem of distance learning is objective assessment of knowledge. Online proctoring systems are one way to discourage student academic fraud. The article discusses the possibilities and problems of using the online proctoring system for online knowledge control. The possibility and feasibility of using proctoring technology in remote monitoring of the progress of university students, as a tool for personal identification are analyzed. Varieties of the proctoring procedure, classification of technologies based on the products of ProctorEdu, Examus, Oqylyq, Aero, Oes are considered, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of the proctoring system. The article notes that the Kazakhstani proctoring systems Oqylyq, Aero, Oes are not inferior to the Russian proctoring systems ProctorEdu, Examus. On the basis of the analysis of proctoring systems, the validity of its application was confirmed from the point of view of efficiency in terms of such indicators as the reliability of identity verification, reduction of time and material costs.