Becoming a Secondary Witness: Art, Trauma, and (non-) Memory of the Kazakh Famine, 1930 – 1933

2022

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.5117/9789048557578/ahm.2022.010
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

What does it mean to be a witness to someone else's pain and suffering? What does it mean to remember an event, the memory of which has not yet taken shape? What ethical positions can artists take in the acts of seeing? Speaking from the position of an artist, who has inherited the traumas of the Soviet past, I will discuss the challenges of becoming a ‘secondary witness’ (Apel, 2002). Taking as an example my art-led research on memory of the Kazakh Famine – a man-made famine caused by the Soviet policies of collectivisation and sedentarisation in the 1930s – I will reflect on the possibilities of artistic witnessing. Drawing on Bracha Ettinger's notion of "wit(h)nessing” that demands to remain with the suffering subject or with the traces of his experience, I will pay more attention to indexical and textual memory fragments; which I attempt to transform aesthetically. ’Here I will reflect on the use of hand-drawing and hand-drawn animation, as a part of the discussion of my role as a mediator between the viewer and the traumatic event.