Names of Turkish Origin in Terms of Meaning Fields in the Kokşetav Copy of «Divân-ı Hikmet»

2022

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.47526/2022-2/2664-0686.06
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article examines the vocabulary of the Kokshetav copy of the main work of one of the prominent figures of Turkic literature Khoja Akhmet Yassawi as «Diwan-i Hikmet» (Divân-ı Hikmet), and also examines the words of Turkic origin, which make up most of the vocabulary of the work. In particular, about three hundred words of Turkic origin in Hikmet were classified by meaning, semantic meanings were analyzed taking into account cultural and ethnic properties. The words used in «Diwan-i Hikmet», which do not have an independent meaning, but whose meanings are revealed when establishing semantic relations in a sentence, were distributed not according to grammatical rules, but according to the meanings they denote: such as orientation, uncertainty, similarity, equality, preference, style, causality, presence-absence The number of words related to each semantic group and the frequency of their use were determined, special attention was paid to semantic groups with a rich vocabulary. At the same time, the features of the work were noted as the place of the words included in each semantic group in the vocabulary of «Diwan-i Hikmet», their emotional and expressive power. Such artistic means as phraseology, metaphor, comparison, epithet, idiom used in the language of the monument indicate that Yassawi skillfully used words and reflects his peculiar stylistic features and the richness of the vocabulary of the monument.