CONCILIATION PROCEDURES IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS IN KAZAKHSTAN IN MODERN CONDITIONS

2022

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.51488/1680-080x/2022.2-43
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

In this article, the author considers alternative ways to resolve disputes, that is, the use of conciliation procedures to resolve conflict situations in civil proceedings. The traditional way of resolving disputes has been and remains the judicial procedure, which is enshrined in the legislation of most states and is a guarantee of respect for human and civil rights. But the author considers conciliation procedures for resolving a dispute in a civil process by concluding a settlement agreement. Also, special attention is paid to resolving the dispute through mediation. The previously existing types of alternative dispute resolution procedures have been supplemented by participatory procedure and judicial mediation.