DESIGNING COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE AS A SYSTEM WITH SPECIFIED PROPERTIES

2022

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.48081/qgnh6917
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article reflects the actual problems of linguistic personality development in the system of bilingual education in the context of the modern socio-cultural situation, the description of the contradictions and perspective ways to solve them. It describes the model of the communicative competence formation of bilingual students, which includes interrelated structural elements and its blocks: target block, motivational, substantive, procedural, technological, criterion-evaluation, and effective block. All these components are connected, mutually dependent and reflect the educational process information. The main feature of the formation of students’ communicative competence model is the consistency and integration of its blocks, which determines the complex orientation of the college educational process to the formation of a graduate who possesses bilingual communicative competence. These model features can combine all participants of the college educational process with the system of goals for each block. The development of any formed quality must be diagnosed in order to clarify the system of specified properties in each block. The diagnostic ways were selected for determining the level of communicative competence development, criteria and indicators correlating with the main structural components of the study were determined. Criteria-based diagnostics of the selected indicators allows us to determine the success of the students’ communicative competence development and the college teachers’ necessary further actions.