EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SELECTED COURSE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF CRITICAL THINKING IN STUDENTS

2022

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.52512/2306-5079-2022-90-2-68-76
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The ability of critical and reflexive thinking is necessary not only for the learning process, in the labor market employers also appreciate specialists who are able to make reasoned decisions, adapt, think and analyze their own and the actions of others. Many methods declare the development of critical thinking in students of higher educational institutions, but, unfortunately, do not measure the actual progress using verified methods for assessing the level of critical thinking. The article offers the results of a study of the effectiveness of the allocated course, aimed at the development of critical thinking among future chemistry teachers. A dedicated course of special seminars aimed at developing critical thinking conducted entirely in an online format in the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic, and considered as an online course using limited methods, but no less effective. The effectiveness of the special seminar course tested by adapting selected questions from the Watson-Glazer questionnaire before and after the course for the control and experimental groups. Then, by comparing the relative values, it was found that for the main five targets (evaluation of approval, interpretation, recognition of assumptions, deduction and the ability to draw conclusions), the experimental group showed an increase compared to the control group. It is prove that the students with whom the course passed, in absolute terms, showed an improvement in all measured parameters by 34% compared with the control group.