Sergey M. Lukyanov, А. С. Деникин, Mikhail A. Naumenko, V. Burjan, Wladyslaw Henryk Trzaska, Muhsin N. Harakeh, D. Étasse, LPC-Caen, ENSICAEN, Université de Caen, CNRS/IN2P3-ENSI, Caen, France, V. Kroha, K. Mendibayev
11 more authors
I. Siváček, V. Glagolev, Š. Pisko, Yu. É. Penionzhkevich, Н. К. Скобелев, I. Stefan, Institut de Physique Nucléaire, Univ. Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France, D. Verney, Institut de Physique Nucléaire, Univ. Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France, Kairat A. Kuterbekov, T. Zholdybayev
How this score is calculated
It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.