Evaluation of the Efficiency of the Hydrophobic Surface Treatment for Bricks Using Neutron Imaging A. El Abd1* , M. Taman2, S.E. Kiсhanov3, E. Hamad1, К.М. Nazarov3,4 1Reactor physics department, Nuclear research Center, Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority, Egypt 2Department of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, TantaUniversity,31511,Tanta, Egypt 3Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980, Dubna, Russia 4Eurasian NationalUniversity, 010008, As

Essam Hammad, Abdelghany El, Mohamed H. Taman, Sergey Kiсhanov, K Nazarof

2022

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.21608/ajnsa.2022.100231.1518
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Capillary water absorption in building materials should be minimized because water carries chemical compounds that cause degradation. The effect of the adhesive covering on capillary water absorption in four different types of masonry bricks was investigated using neutron radiography. Only one sample revealed the creation of two layers of the coat to protect bricks against water infiltration. Water is absorbed into the gap between the two layers by capillary action. The progress of the water front between the two layers is proportional to the square root of the absorption time. The capillary penetration coefficient is 3.25 times faster than that of the identical type of sample in the bulk. Between the two layers, the amount of water absorbed is half of what is in the bulk of the sample. The coat is incapable of repelling water ingress in some samples The coat is effective on some surfaces but not recommended on others.