COMPUTER VISION MODEL COMPARISON

Herald of Kazakh-British technical university, 2021

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.55452/1998-6688-2021-18-3-75-82
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The use of machine learning in the medical field is one of the most difficult and thoroughly unsolved problems. Currently, there are many different algorithms for solving problems in the field of diagnostics an segmentation of biomedical images. Researchers are often faced with the challenge of choosing the best method to apply towards their data. We conducted the empirical research and compared 5 algorithms that able to detect anomalies in the medical images: RCNN, Fast-RCNN, Faster-RCNN, Mask R CNN, U-Net, and Residual Neural Network. The advantages of automatic processing of the medical images are apparent: doctors get a convenient software tool that allows them to diagnose the disease faster and reduce possible errors. The task is to study and then select algorithms for further testing on the actual data. The selection and study of algorithms were based on articles describing the architecture and application of computer vision algorithms.