Blood transfusion therapy in cancer patients: modern aspects

2021

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.52532/2521-6414-2020-4-58-53-55
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Relevance: Anemia is a common syndrome in cancer patients, and blood transfusion is the most common treatment for anemia. Anemia and blood transfusion are associated with worse clinical outcomes. The efficacy and safety of different blood transfusion strategies are unclear. The purpose was to analyze current blood transfusion strategies in oncology. Results: In most clinical situations, a restrictive strategy showed efficacy and safety. However, low perioperative hemoglobin level is associated with increased mortality and complication rates. Several clinical trials demonstrated the benefits of liberal strategy; it may be due to comorbidities and low compensatory ability. Conclusion: In cancer patients, anemia is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Therefore, modern blood transfusion therapy strategies in oncology follow the restrictive approach, taking into account possible blood transfusion complications. Cancer patients are a complicated patient category and require an individual approach to postoperative anemia treatment.