The influence of radiation the quality of life assessment in patients with metastatic brain lesions

2020

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.52532/2663-4864-2020-3-57-17-19
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Relevance: Metastatic brain lesion (MBL) is a serious complication of the course of cancer. The advances in medicinal treatment have increased patients’ overall survival and, thereby, the MBL frequency. On the other hand, opportunities for the treatment of patients with MBL are expanding. Microsurgical techniques, stereotactic radiation therapy, and radiosurgery are actively implemented. Effective therapy and local control of MBL are of paramount importance for the prognosis and quality of life (QOL) of patients. This study aimed to investigate the influence of radiation therapy on quality of life assessment in patients with metastatic brain lesions. Results: The QOL analysis of patients with MBL showed that QOL mainly depends on the localization, histo-biological properties of the tumor, the severity of preoperative neurological deficit, as well as age and gender. MBL control may be important for maintaining the patient’s QOL but does not always affect survival, which is determined by the activity and prevalence of the disease. Conclusion: The QOL of patients with MBL is the defining criterion for assessing their condition and the effect of the therapy. This is because the limitations of the normal existence of the patient arising from a chronic disease are often more important to the patient than the symptoms of the disease.