Comparison of strength-based rock brittleness indices with the brittleness index measured via Yagiz’s approaches

2021

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/833/1/012038
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Abstract Rock brittleness is one of the most significant properties of rock having a major impact not only on the failure process of intact rock but also on the response of rock mass to rock excavation. In fact, the brittleness is a combination of rock properties including not only the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and Brazilian tensile strength (BTS) but also density and porosity of rocks. Due to that, the brittleness should be examined very carefully for any excavation projects, i.e., mechanized excavation, drilling and blasting. The aim of this paper is to compare the strength-based brittleness indices with both the rock brittleness index (BIo), directly obtained via punch penetration test (PPT) and also estimated via Yagiz’s approach (BI1) as a function of strengths and density of rocks. For the aim, database including more than 45 tunnel cases are used to compute common rock brittleness indices (BI2, BI3, BI4), different combination of UCS and BTS. Further, these indices are compared with both BIo and BI1 as well as each other. It is found that the BIo and BI1 have a significant relations (ranging of determination coefficients (r2) from 0.69 to 0.88 with strength-based brittleness indices commonly used in practice. Also, based on findings, several rock brittleness classifications are also revised herein.