The Main Issues of the Formation of State Power in the Works of Al-Farabi

2021

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.47526/habarshy.vi2.574
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article examines the main issues of the formation of state power in the work of Al-Farabi. The study of the value content of the Turkish spiritual tradition continues in modern humanities. Its popularity is due to the fact that the heritage of the past is relevant for our contemporaries, and our present is closely connected with the culture of the past. In his socio-political views, Al-Farabi played a key role in society, realizing the ideal of a perfect person who was the ruler of an intelligent state. The essence of Al-Farabi's teachings lies not only in the spiritual development of a person, but also in the improvement of legal and legislative norms in society. According to the Second Teacher, only an educated, moral person can bring spiritual benefit. Here the idea of the ruler, based on the works of Al-Farabi, fulfills a special mission. Determination of the place and role of the leader in the social process, the dialectics of objective and subjective factors in the history and dialectics of public life occurs after reading the research works of Al-Farabi. Thus, Al-Farabi's idea of the state and its correct management, that the highest mission of the ruler is capable of embracing the principles of state structure that have developed in the real history of Kazakhstan, in the structure of the world, as the highest meanings and values of ontogeny that have human and social significance, are still relevant.