DISCUSSIONS ABOUT THE NATURE OF THE UPRISING IN 1916 (1920-1930)

2020

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.51889/2020-2.1728-5461.10
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article discusses the discussions of 1920-1930 about the nature, causes and consequences of the 1916 uprising. It also analyzes the activities and positions of the national intelligentsia during the uprising, in particular the discussion held in the Komvuz of name Goloshchekin in the 1931 which was organized by the Kazakh Regional Committee of the party on the anniversary of the 15 th anniversary of the uprising.