Balanced scorecard for evaluating intellectual capital in higher education institutions

E.S. Slyamova

2020

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.51889/2020-4.1728-8940.25
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Purpose of the article: to show the balanced scorecard as a useful tool for assessing the activities of universities. Universities make strategic plans to achieve their goals. However, these plans can fail if the required resources are not available. The most valuable resources at any university are the experience of faculty and staff and its intellectual capital. Therefore, if a university effectively evaluates and manages these valuable resources, it can rationally design and use strategies to achieve its goals.