NATIONAL FEATURES OF ZOONYMIC PHRASEOLOGIES IN KAZAKH AND TURKISH LANGUAGES

2020

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.51889/2020-3.1728-7804.23
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article provides a cognitive-semantic analysis of phraseological units of the Kazakh and Turkish languages ​​containing zoonymic names. In other words, the role of zoonyms of the two languages ​​in the composition of phraseological units, commonality and differences in the formation of Turkic knowledge in recognizing the linguistic image of the world in it is analyzed in detail. Despite the fact that in Kazakh and Turkish linguistics there is a lot of research on the generalized theory of phraseology, there are many aspects of the comparative study of the phraseology of two languages. This is due to the fact that social and economic conditions in the history of the development of two kindred peoples, various historical events, the habitat of the two peoples undoubtedly influenced the development of the language. In particular, such changes left their mark on the phraseological fund of two related peoples, including the formation of zoonymic phraseology. In this article, we will focus on the comparison of zoomorphic phraseology in the languages of two peoples with similar roots in the context of intercultural communication.