ANTHROPOCENTRIC PARADIGM OF PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS IN RUSSIAN AND ARABIC

2020

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.51889/2020-3.1728-7804.17
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article examines the anthropocentric paradigm of phraseological units in Russian and Arabic. The implementation of concepts is provided at a certain level: social, spiritual, physiological, material, emotional, intellectual. The social level of values is represented by the axiological dyad "labor, labor – lack of work, idleness, laziness, rest". The spiritual level of values is represented by the axiological dyad "kind, generous-greedy, not generous". The physiological level is considered on the example of antonimov: life-death, health-illness, sleep-insomnia. The material level is represented by the "wealth-poverty" pair. The emotional level of value is considered on the example of the "joy-grief" paradigm. The intellectual level of values is represented by the axiological dyad "mind, mind-stupidity, stupidity". The proposed anthropocentric features comprehensively characterize the concept of "man": this is an image, information content, and evaluation features.