EVOLUTION OF THE REAL CULTURAL NAMES APPROPRIATE OF TURKIC LANGUAGES

2020

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.51889/2020-2.1728-7804.25
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Language is the mirror of culture. The relationship between language and culture is very important. It is known that types and names of every culture are characterized and given through generation. It is connected with the formation of psychological entirety, as economic regional entirety, and the origin of nation and related language, economic regional entirety and related language. Therefore to define the similarity and difference between the names of Turkic languages is one of the main problems of linguistics. It’s known that the word evolution is always changing and developing. And this growth influences to the usage of words and their meanings. This article investigates the real cultural names of Turkic languages and their difference in meaning and form is defined by language historical data. Etymologic and historical-comparative analysis are made to the semantics of archaisms in modern Kazakh language.