Improving the system for Health technology assessment in Kazakhstan for healthcare decision-making

2020

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.32921/2225-9929-2020-36-18-24
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

health field in many developed countries. Modern tendencies give plenty of evidence of wide development of HTA processes and their implementation on a global scale. Along with these tendencies, there are number of issues that hinder active implementation and use of HTA worldwide including Kazakhstan. Major issues that limit further development and implementation of HTA processes in our country are lack of human resources, evidence-based medicine data, and tight deadlines for HTA reporting. Furthermore, they affect the quality of HTA reports followed by inadequate decision-making by the members of the Joint Commission for the Quality of Health Services and overall decreased collaboration with the international HTA agencies. To resolve these issues in the HTA system development, we propose policies that involve training and re-training specialists for the HTA field starting from undergraduate and postgraduate education. We also suggest optimization of HTA structures funding and enhancement of regulatory framework, which, in turn, control not only HTA processes, but also decision-making based on HTA results.