Ways to improve the socio-economic situation of rural settlements

2021

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.46914/1562-2959-2021-1-1-39-46
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

In the article, the authors identified a group of problems in its implementation, reflecting a number of programs adopted for the development of rural settlements in Kazakhstan, and suggested ways to effectively solve them. Among the main problems that negatively affect the development of rural settlements were: incomplete financing of rural development programs; duplication of the government's structural activities with the structure of local akimats in comparison with economic activities; dilapidated social and engineering infrastructure in priority villages of the Republic; decrease in the quality of education due to the lack of competition among social professionals in the SNP. In order to effectively address these problems, a number of proposals were made, including: it is shown that there is a need for phased funding of SNP development programs and strict control over its implementation, and the main reasons. To increase the remuneration of specialists in the field of agriculture, it was shown that it is necessary to develop applied solutions aimed at improving performance in the field of agriculture. The need for the competent authorities to develop a large-scale plan for the development, promotion and introduction of opportunities for private entrepreneurship and small business in agriculture was justified. It is shown that budget expenditures for the development of rural localities with small or low potential in the SNP are inefficient. The methods of research, analysis, synthesis, dynamic comparison, systematization, economic expertise, and generalization of scientific data were used in the disclosure of the topic.