Understanding the results of practical experience for development of students ability to reasoned deliberation

2020

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.48081/fvhf6270
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

"The article indicates the relevance of the development of students’ ability to reasoned deliberation as an integral component of critical thinking. The authors designate and make an attempt to understand some of the problematic aspects of the development process in students’ ability to reasonably deliberate. It is based on the analysis of the researchers’ existing practical expertise. In particular, the article points out that argumentation skills do not arise automatically under the influence of the learning process, but need targeted shaping and training. It is also noted that in the process of socialization, a person can involuntarily acquire irrational ideas, which impede the formation of reasoning skills and contribute to the emergence of such negative phenomena as «naive rationalism» and «cognitive dissonance». At the same time, the authors designate the development of educational programs based on the principles of rational-emotional behavioral therapy as one of the advanced trends aimed to correct development of argumentation skills and containment of irrational beliefs. "