QUICK DETERMINATION OF THE OPTIMAL FRACTURE FILLER FOR HYDRAUILC FRACTURING

2020

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.37878/2708-0080/2020-5.040
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Hydraulic fracturing is one of the most effective methods for stimulation. At present, it is actively used around the world, as well as in our country, in Kazakhstan. Currently, many producing fields are at their advanced production stage, and new fields are in such geological conditions when hydrocarbons are extracted from tight reservoirs. Hydraulic fracturing allows maintaining the economic profitability of the development of such fields. However, like other stimulation methods, hydraulic fracturing has a number of disadvantages, including proppant flowback. Proppant flowback after hydraulic fracturing treatments is quite serious challenge. This could be the deterioration of the downhole equipment with a subsequent frequent workovers; decrease in well productivity. Some special methods including preventive as well as corrective measures already exist in the industry to overcome the proppant flowback problems. The paper considers systematization of fourteen preventive methods. Based on physical, chemical, and technological properties of each listed method, as well as the knowledge of the main reasons of the proppant flowback the authors systematize all methods and propose an initial decision-making algorithm and a matrix of methods applicability. The algorithm and the matrix were tested under conditions of Uzen field, Kazakhstan. The paper may be of interest to fracturing engineers, production engineers, operation engineers, and other professionals