DEVELOPMENT OF INFORMATION SYSTEM MODULE FOR USER RATING ANALYSIS

2020

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.51775/1999-9801_2020_51_4_184
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

In the article the development and implementation of information systems for indicative planning and ranking of the university's activities are described. The author has created a flexible and complex information system that allows integrating the internal business processes of the university. Monitoring and analysis, the organization of medium-term indicative planning within the framework of the concept of results-based management and the internal rating of the activities of the teaching staff, departments and faculties were carried out in this system. It is intended for the formation and analysis of a medium-term indicative plan for the scientific and educational activities of a higher educational institution and the rating of the teaching staff, departments and faculties Key words. Rating, analysis, monitoring, indicative plan