HEALTH PERFORMANCE AUDIT

2021

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.32014/2021.2518-1467.23
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article discusses the directions and key issues of audit of efficiency in healthcare in foreign countries and in Russia. The analysis of the impact of the performance audit on the solution of socially important problems of maintaining public health is carried out. The authors determined the purpose of the audit of efficiency in the health sector, which is to promote the financial interests of the state, to ensure public health needs, to support accountability and responsibility regarding the activities of healthcare institutions. The medical effectiveness of healthcare institutions is determined as the degree of achieved results in the diagnosis, treatment, prevention, rehabilitation of patients, which is expressed as a percentage (or shares) based on the ratio of the number of cases of achieved results to the total number of observations. The absence of a specialized and legislatively fixed list of executive bodies endowed with control and supervisory powers in relation to healthcare institutions was noted. It was revealed that the requirement to exercise control related to the licensing functions of state supervision in Russia has not been established. Based on a study of foreign practice of financial control, it was found that performance audits represent a significant proportion of the control measures taken, and is the most progressive form of financial control. The article systematizes the bodies for monitoring compliance with mandatory requirements for goods, works and services at the level of medical institutions. Their non-systematic work, lack of interconnection in the implementation of supervisory activities as a factor that reduces the effectiveness of their authority is revealed.