Will the name of Mashen be retained for the wintering of Akhmet Baitursynov’s family?

2020

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.26577/jh.2020.v98.i3.15
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

In the field season of 2019, the Turgay team of the A.Kh. Margulan Institute of Archaeology conductedan exploratory study of the wintering of Akhmet Baytursynov’s family – Mashen. For the firsttime, the archaeological study of the area was conducted in 2016 by A.Z. Beisenov. The site is locatedon the shores of the Ulyjylanshyk River in the Jangildin District of the Kostanay Region. As a result ofthis work, the preserved ruined remains of several structures, forming a complex of objects, and relatedto the concepts of life and death, were revealed. The complex includes the remains of residential andutility buildings, as well as objects associated with funeral rite. The closer acquaintance with the siteraises the question posed in the title of the article, as the plates installed on the site are missing thename Mashen. The article discusses the possibility of museumification of these objects. Currently, in thenational science, there is a positive trend in the study of the modern history sites. Archaeological, systematicresearch into the Kazakh winterings is of major importance, in particular in addressing the issuesof economic development of the Steppe, settlement, environmental adaptation. The implementationof the museumification of the “Mashen” complex is specifically topical at present. The development ofthe museum should involve not only the departments responsible for science, culture, architecture, butthose dealing with the management of motorways, air routes, bridge construction, telecommunications.