Predicting the consumer guilt-based purchasing behavior (A Case Study of Shopping Centers in Almaty)

2020

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.24200/jmas.vol8iss2pp49-59
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Sometimes, consumer feels unpleasant and unusual after consuming and even after not consuming and explores himself about his behavior when purchasing or non-purchasing, and compares the behavior with ethical principles and social norms. Eventually he feels regret, this sense of regret provides the basis for the emergence of coping responses to modify purchasing behavior. In this study, consumer guilt was selected that is the result of violating social norms, internal failure, unjustified excessive consuming, lack of self-control, as well as consuming for fun and enjoyment, it was implemented among the consumers' community referring to Almaty Metropolitan Shopping Centers using the structural equation method (SEM). Data were collected using standard questionnaires and analyzed using SPSS and Amos software. There was a positive and significant relationship between guilt and purchasing, non-purchasing, violating norms, self-blame and hedonism. There was also a positive and significant relationship between guilt and coping responses and predicting future purchasing behaviors. Also, in the final model of research, purchase for hedonism and fun had the most impact on the consumer guilt.