Colonial Turkestan: contemporary foreign historiography on resettlement politics

2020

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.26577/jh.2020.v98.i3.09
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Success of the Russian presence in Turkestan was determined by character of colonialism and imperialismwhich was transferred to the soil of Turkestan in 1870-1900s. This is a key question to understanda nature and goals of the national liberation movements that emerged within this period on the territoryof empire. Political trajectories of the Russian empire development depended, to a certain degree, onthe results of Turkestan colonization. Would the empire be able to complete successfully “civilizing colonialism”mission and within what range it was possible to realize? The answers to these questions weredue to the administration and Russian capital achievements in Turkestan – the only empire’s colony.In this article the author ties to analyze an array of problems raised in the works of British historian A.Morrison. He is actively involved into studies of Russian colonial society’s problems in pre-revolutionaryTurkestan. Morrison dwells on the nature of metropole – colony relations to focus on the results of fundamentalchanges in Turkestan governor general and its differences form the other Moslem populatedimperial areas.