MULTIPLE MINI-INTERVIEWS AS A METHOD OF A DIFFERENTIATED SELECTION OF CANDIDATES FOR RESIDENCY

2020

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.46594/2687-0037_2020_3_1228
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The authors describe the results of a study of the investigating of the opinion of candidates on the conducted differential selection for training in residency programs. For the purpose of qualitative selection of applicants for residency training, an objective structured clinical examination is conducted, including multiple mini-interview stations. The study received positive feedback on the selection procedure as a qualitative and reliable method for assessing the ability to learn, while the situational tasks were not difficult, understandable and accessible for understanding the purpose of selection.