TESTING VULKAN VISUALIZATION FOR GEOMODELS ON SYSTEMS WITH GRAPHIC PROCESSORS FOR RAY TRACING

2020

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.47533/2020.1606-146x.05
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This paper describes the development of a high-performance application for representing twodimensional and three-dimensional results of numerical calculations in graphical form. Two visualization modules developed on the basis of different methods for translating a three-dimensional model into a twodimensional image are compared. Vulcan technologies and rasterization and Ray Tracing algorithms are used for model visualization, and comparative analyses of the operation of two applications in different conditions are performed. The developed visualization modules can be used to display the results of numerical mathematical modeling on three-dimensional grids.