Болашақ дефектолог имиджін қалыптастырудың теориялық-практикалық негіздемесі

The Journal of Psychology and Sociology, 2019

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.26577/jpss.2019.v70.i3.03
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article defines the theoretical and methodological foundations, the meaning and content of the concept of image, examines the psychological and pedagogical aspects of the formation of the image of the future defectologist and the image of the teacher. Thus, the image is an image of a person, which is formed on the basis of the appearance of the person, his habits, manner of speech, mentality, actions, etc. The structure of the correct image of the future defectologist is determined, as a result of which the necessary indicators and a complex criterion for the formation of the image of the future defectologist are established: cognitive (knowledge about the image, professional and personal self-improvement), motivational (search for ways and opportunities to build a trajectory of personal and professional development, positive emotional and value attitude to yourself and others), activity (experience of image formation). On the basis of clearly different measurements and indicators of the phenomenon of the study, we have identified interrelated levels showing the degree of image development, the formation of the image of the future defectologist: higher, medium and low. In order to determine the levels of these indicators and criteria were used research methods (test, questionnaire). Key words: University, student, image of future defectologist, professional competence, personality, mentality, image-maker, external image, personal properties, empathy.