Әлеуметтік философия мен мәдениет философиясындағы компаративистік әдіс

2019

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.26577/jpcp.2019.v68.i2.06
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article is devoted to the evaluation of the role and advantages of the comparative method in the structure of social and humanitarian studies. The authors have revealed the peculiarity of the comparative method in the context of cultural and social objects and phenomena. The main problems of the comparative analysis in the framework of the dialogue between the cultures of the East and the West, the «connection» of their mental experience, the development of the practice of communication and mutual understanding, as well as the transformation in assessing the philosophical systems of East and West are noted in the article. The article notes the limits of applicability of comparative studies in the cultural sphere, as well as their prospects. The authors of the article draw a conclusion about the practical tasks and goals of the comparative approach in the cognitive and scientific fields, as well as in the social and cultural fields.Key words: comparativistics, philosophical comparativistics, culture, civilization, methodology, values, identity, dialogue of cultures, modernization, spirituality, consciousness.