THE MAIN DIRECTIONS OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSMENT OF INTEGRATION EFFECTS IN THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION IN THE CONDITIONS OF GLOBAL CHALLENGES

2019

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.26577/cajsh-2019-2-s3
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article considers the strategic directions of economic development of the member states of theEurasian Economic Union, based on available resources and objective opportunities for their joint effective use.With all the turbulence and uncertainty that exist today in the world economy, the definition of the main directionsfor the coordination of economic policies looks extremely important and timely. In general, by 2030, the results ofthe economic development of the EAEU have to show the world competitiveness of the integration association. Inthe 2030s, the economic development of the EAEU would be possible to overcome the competitive advantages ofintegration integration. The Customs Union of Kazakhstan, Belarus and Russia is a logical breakthrough from theEurasian Economic Community. Established in 2000 in the format of Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia andTadjikistan – a momentous moment in the practice of the Eurasian integration. For all 11 years EurAsEC has beenshaped by the mechanism of differentiation of mechanisms in the integration process. By the way, they do not justbecome intergovernmental, but also by initiative entrepreneurs, educators, education and culture, NGOs, and youth.With the help of the global financial and economic crisis, the creation of the Eurasian bank was undermined by the anticrisis. Kazakhstan considers Eurasia Union as an open project. Его нельзяпредстaвить без междунaродномуобщественности,нaпример,с Евросоюзом,with other convergence. Astana observes that the Euroasian Soyuz propiska isa defensive part of the Chinese definition of economic expansion.Key words: ЕАEU, integration effects, Eurasian integration.